<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Auto Show &#038; Secretary Chu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/2010/01/washington-auto-show-secretary-chu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/2010/01/washington-auto-show-secretary-chu/</link>
	<description>is your source for the latest information on fuel cells.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 02:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ANANT RAJ</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/2010/01/washington-auto-show-secretary-chu/#comment-10876</link>
		<dc:creator>ANANT RAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/?p=143#comment-10876</guid>
		<description>The Obama Administration proposed today to reduce funding for PEM-based hydrogen and fuel cell programs in FY 2011, proposing $137 million (a reduction of $37 million), and provided no money for new vehicle deployment under the Technology Validation program.  SECA program funding was proposed at $50 million, a reduction of $4 million from 2010. 

There was no public criticism of the hydrogen program this year from the Secretary, and no attempt at outright elimination.  But the cuts are significant and include programs of greatest importance to the industry.
what is your reaction about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama Administration proposed today to reduce funding for PEM-based hydrogen and fuel cell programs in FY 2011, proposing $137 million (a reduction of $37 million), and provided no money for new vehicle deployment under the Technology Validation program.  SECA program funding was proposed at $50 million, a reduction of $4 million from 2010. </p>
<p>There was no public criticism of the hydrogen program this year from the Secretary, and no attempt at outright elimination.  But the cuts are significant and include programs of greatest importance to the industry.<br />
what is your reaction about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANANT RAJ</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/2010/01/washington-auto-show-secretary-chu/#comment-10875</link>
		<dc:creator>ANANT RAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/?p=143#comment-10875</guid>
		<description>well i'm writing this letter because i went through this year's fiscal plan regarding fuel cells and turns out that the funding has reduced in all sectors, which to me is a worring aspect what may be the possible reason behind it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i&#8217;m writing this letter because i went through this year&#8217;s fiscal plan regarding fuel cells and turns out that the funding has reduced in all sectors, which to me is a worring aspect what may be the possible reason behind it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/2010/01/washington-auto-show-secretary-chu/#comment-10837</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuelcellinsider.org/?p=143#comment-10837</guid>
		<description>I hope to read about new fuel cells cars&lt;a href="http://www.fuelcellsinfo.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.fuelcellsinfo.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope to read about new fuel cells cars<a href="http://www.fuelcellsinfo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fuelcellsinfo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
